Off the top of my head:
Pay Go/Reduces Medical Costs - check out the letters from the CBO that state that the cost of implementation vis-a-vie the IRS and HHS are NOT included in the bill ---- add 50 billion plus to the cost of the bill.
Pay Go/Reduces Medical Costs - check out the fact that the Doc Fix Bill will come to the floor of the House in a few months, as it does every year, that increases medicare reimbursement rates that is NOT included in the bill ---- add between 208 and 320 billion to the cost of health care.
Covers Kids - The CHIP program and (SCHIP programs in the states) passed earlier this year already covered kids. You'll find that as an attachment to the Agriculture Bill.
Read the CBO letters that tell of the double counting that takes place in the estimates and the pure BS touted by Obama in his assertion that this bill reduces the deficit.
Check last weeks House agenda and find that they passed earmark legislation that prohibits the House from passing earmarks. Then check Issa's point of order on the floor today regarding that and see the transcripts. Louise Slaughter admits that the earmarks are still in the bill. All but Nebraska and Florida were removed.
Results - Pay Go is a rule in the House; No Earmarks is a rule in the House. In passing the Senate Bill and the resulting Reconciliation Bill, the House did not adhere to it's own rules.
My answer is a resounding NO.
For interesting tidbit - find the Plouffe/Rove piece from Sunday Morning talk show "This Week". Karl lays the dollars out for David showing this in fact a 500 to 700 billion dollar deficit bill. Plouffe cannot refute it.
FYI - David Camp R-MI - has every number you need if you need them.
Good luck. I hope your class is much more wise than the House was tonight.